WSJ Says EMR Efforts Get Pushback

The WSJ health blog wrote an interesting article a week or so ago that describe the EMR stimulus as “Too Much, Too Soon” Here’s an excerpt of the article:

At issue are the grants available under the stimulus bill to doctors and hospitals showing “meaningful use” of electronic health records. Early signs are that meeting that “meaningful use” standard will be tough, with about 24 requirements by 2011, Politico says. (A final rule is expected this month.)

It’s tough for doctors’ offices and hospitals to fully digitize their operations in that short period, and not clear that early returns on systems allowing such things as digitally transmitted prescriptions or patient access to electronic records will show gains in either costs or quality of care, Politico says. Suggestions include pushing back the deadline or, as one HHS official says, a partial credit system.

Here’s the link to the Politico article they mention.

Of course, my question is, are these comments “Too Little, Too Late” for HHS and the government to be able to do anything about changing the EMR stimulus plans around meaningful use and certified EHR?

About the author

John Lynn

John Lynn

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com, a network of leading Healthcare IT resources. The flagship blog, Healthcare IT Today, contains over 13,000 articles with over half of the articles written by John. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 20 million times.

John manages Healthcare IT Central, the leading career Health IT job board. He also organizes the first of its kind conference and community focused on healthcare marketing, Healthcare and IT Marketing Conference, and a healthcare IT conference, EXPO.health, focused on practical healthcare IT innovation. John is an advisor to multiple healthcare IT companies. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can be found on Twitter: @techguy.

1 Comment

  • In light of his public remarks this week, Dr. Blumenthal appears to be rather unsympathetic to the industry stakeholder calls for relaxation of both the MU criteria and the compliance timelines. We’ve been moving ahead on the working assumption that the MU Final Rule set (ostensibly to be issued by 6/30) will be essentially the same as the IFR.

    Then there’s the EHR Cert the issue resolution, still even further out.

Click here to post a comment
   

Categories