This week, I visited a hospital which belonged to a health system going with Epic. This hospital, one of the smaller facilities in the chain, was running Picis in the ED and (I think) Cerner throughout, but the decision had been made to convert everything to Epic sometime soon, a tech told me.
I can’t say the news was surprising, but it was disappointing nonetheless. The community hospital in question has given me excellent service, and my guess is that when Epic barrels in, it will lose its way — at least for a while — frazzling the staff and decreasing the quality of their interaction with me.
However, I ‘d better get used to this trend. As Healthcare Technology Online editor in chief Ken Congdon notes in an excellent editorial, the pendulum is definitely swinging toward enterprise-wide EMR implementations, a direction encouraged by the standardized demands imposed nationwide by Meaningful Use.
If interoperability was easier to pull off, things might be different. But with HL7 and other integration standards and languages still not quite up to the job, one can see the sense of going with an enterprise option.
Here’s the story one CIO told Congdon as to why he’s deploying Siemens Soarian solution:
Michael Mistretta, CIO of MedCentral Health System [said:] “Vendor management was a key consideration in our decision to use a single vendor approach to EMR implementation,” says Mistretta. “With a single vendor, I only have one finger to point at. It simplifies my environment because I don’t have Siemens telling me it’s McKesson’s problem and vice versa. Also, the built-in interoperability is key. There is a trade-off in the fact that the system does not provide prime functionality to certain departments or specialties within our health system, but at this point in time, it’s much more beneficial for our organization to have the ability to share data across the continuum of care quickly and easily.”
CIOs of large hospitals also told Congdon that enterprise system replacements were much cheaper than going through a long-term, highly-complex integration effort.
In an interesting twist, however, hospital IT leaders from mid-sized to smaller hospitals have reached the opposite conclusion, Congdon reports. They’ve been telling him that buying an enterprise system would be much more expensive than sticking with what they had and making it interoperate.
I see a market opening here. If enterprise EMR vendors can get their pricing in line for smaller hospitals, they may have a lot more wins coming their way than they expected. Interesting stuff.