Epic & Meditech: Distant Cousins?

Chris O’Neal is Managing Partner at KATALUS Advisors. KATALUS Advisors is a strategic consulting firm focused on the healthcare vertical. We serve healthcare technology vendors, hospitals, and private equity groups in North America, Europe, and the Middle East. Our services span growth strategies in new and existing markets, M&A due diligence, market analysis, and advisory services. www.KATALUSadvisors.com

A recent comment on a blog post suggested that Epic is following a similar trajectory which Meditech pioneered, basically positing that Meditech was the Epic of 15 years ago. This has obviously generated some controversy as knowledgeable folks have taken up both sides of this argument. In reality, there is no clean “yes” or “no” answer. There are key similarities, as well as stark differences in these two vendors.

In terms of similarities, Epic and Meditech both adhere to a common product delivery philosophy in that they build products rooted in a single-database platform. Both companies believe that integration is key to the success of HIT and have continued to develop their products around that philosophy. Both products even share the use of MUMPS as their backend architecture.

Yet, Meditech did something no other vendor was able to do for the longest time: They delivered an integrated enterprise solution at prices which community hospitals could afford. While Meditech racked up win after win in the community hospital space, Epic approached the market from the opposite end of the spectrum by selling their inpatient solutions to the largest hospitals and IDNs. And the price tag reflected the scale of those contracts. Another difference which has been shared by some is the view that Epic is much more controlling in their processes and approach to working with hospitals. Meditech does not have the same “my way or no way” reputation. Additionally, Epic has consistently improved the usability and functionality of their products, while Meditech has released new versions and enhancements at a slower pace.

In the final analysis, it is probably logical to say Epic and Meditech are more dissimilar than they are similar, when both companies are viewed holistically. This is especially true if we consider that Epic is winning the lion’s share of hospital contracts that it goes after, while Meditech, which still maintains the largest hospital customer base in the industry, is working hard to deliver new software to the hospitals it has already won.

About the author

John Lynn

John Lynn

John Lynn is the Founder of HealthcareScene.com, a network of leading Healthcare IT resources. The flagship blog, Healthcare IT Today, contains over 13,000 articles with over half of the articles written by John. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 20 million times.

John manages Healthcare IT Central, the leading career Health IT job board. He also organizes the first of its kind conference and community focused on healthcare marketing, Healthcare and IT Marketing Conference, and a healthcare IT conference, EXPO.health, focused on practical healthcare IT innovation. John is an advisor to multiple healthcare IT companies. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can be found on Twitter: @techguy.

1 Comment

  • […] Read more & let us know what you think in the comments. MEDITECH, Recent Items   backend architecture, Chris O’Neal, EHR, Electronic Health Record, electronic medical record, EMR, Epic, Europe, healthcare technology vendors, Hospital EMR and EHR, hospitals, Katalus Advisors, Middle East., MUMPS, North America, private equity groups      healthsystemCIO.com: Bill Byers, VP/CIO, Western Maryland Health System, Chapter 4 » […]

Click here to post a comment