I have a lot more to say about EHR certification and the battle we’re about to see between Drummond Group and CCHIT for EMR vendors, but I’m about to leave for an interesting conference on meaningful use, EMR and HIE. Although, I did want to just start the conversation on becoming a certified EHR.
It seems like the battle is just beginning to try and secure EHR vendors under a certain certification. One of the competitive differences right now is about speed. Which EHR certification body will be the first to certify an EHR under the ARRA guidelines. It will be a big PR move for the first EHR vendor and should benefit Drummond Group or CCHIT to be first.
From the dates that I’ve heard, Drummond Group seems like they’ll be accepting applications for certification first (near the end of this month). CCHIT will be doing it at the beginning of October. It will be interesting to see how quickly Drummond Group will be able to turn around the EHR certification results.
Plus, one other wrinkle in this area is that CCHIT is giving priority to the EHR vendors that are already CCHIT Certified or Preliminary ARRA certified. This means the other 250+ EHR vendors are being treated as second class citizens. You can guess where that larger part of the EHR market is going for their certification: Drummond Group.
John… Fact that CCHIT will prioritize their certification toward those applications from existing CCHIT clients is simply good business.
CCHIT isn’t treating those companies who didn’t seek CCHIT certification before now as “second class citizens”. They are treating their returning customers as first class citizens. That’s part of what the vendors get for their money. Right?
Since the existing clients are already CCHIT certified they are familiar with the process and their testing philosophy so that process should move more swiftly. Am sure Drummond will attract many who don’t have a CCHIT credential already … which could slow down that pipeline.
Were I a vendor … and the process allowed it … I would submit packages to both CCHIT and Drummond simultaneously. If I am confident in my package … I pull back the second package as soon as one of the certifiers begins processing its test package. Or … I just let them both go through the process as a backup for a potential issue whereby one certifier fails the package … and the other passes it. Worst case … both pass … and both credentials go on the box.
DonB – if it weren’t so expensive to apply, I think we’d see more vendors using this strategy.
In addition to price and timeliness, I was wondering about “brand name” – CCHIT does carry a bit of buyer assurance with it as of today, as they’ve been the ‘go-to’ certification group out there for the EHR marketplace.
I suspect this will change rapidly as CIO’s as well as vendors realize that certification is certification in terms of Meaningful Use eligibility. Whatever can get you there cheaply and quickly is probably the better investment.
Naveen
I know some EHR vendors that are considering doing Drummond just because it’s faster than CCHIT. No doubt Drummond will have to battle for branding like CCHIT. They’ve done a better job marketing CCHIT than creating a certification;-)
More on all of this tomorrow including those EHR vendors that were previously CCHIT certified.
[…] I mentioned in my previous post about the race to be the first EHR certified (and the first ATCB to certify an EHR), there’s a lot more going on in the battle amongst the […]
[…] Drummond Group just posted the news of the first 3 EHR vendors which have been officially certified EHR for the ARRA EHR stimulus money. Looks like Drummond Group won the race to be the first to certify an EHR. […]
Hi, Timing is important here and as compare to CCHIT, Drummond gives more comfort and ease to answer very important question “Is product ready to get through the certification test?” their support for test preparation allows you to feel assured about passing the certification test in quick time.